- #TERACOPY PRO BENEFITS DRIVER#
- #TERACOPY PRO BENEFITS WINDOWS 10#
- #TERACOPY PRO BENEFITS SOFTWARE#
- #TERACOPY PRO BENEFITS WINDOWS#
#TERACOPY PRO BENEFITS WINDOWS#
I do now believe through all of the data & facts I have given in my original post that there is a fundamental issue or bug in how Windows (current Pro version) handles file copying at the Explorer level and possibly more. Even if by some magical mishap the bios says PCIe 4.0 but it was still running at PCIe 3.0 x4, I would still expect 4GBytes/sec of maximum hardware throughput per connection, way more than I'm experiencing here. I understand your logic, however the drives I am using are running (explicit in BIOS) at PCIe 4.0 x4 speeds, or 8GBytes/sec of maximum hardware throughput for a single connection. In the range of 1700MBps for each drive on the 1TB and 2TB versions of the PRO SSD’s have a DRAM cache (& 980 Pro - Intelligent TurboWrite 2.0) that canīe exhausted and then the speeds drop down to the SSD’s speed capacity that are Limit related to AMD implementations in windows ?
Speeds to basic speeds 2133, 2333, 2666, 2800, 3000 (no change in file copy performance) To open or save files, such as Photoshop, benefit from faster than 2GB/sec readĪnd writes. If I use standard windows copy or to use TeraCopy I still get this hard limit That raid has 14GB/sec read speed and 12GB/sec write speed (expected) Run the benchmarks with all 4 disks in the following slots:Ĩ.01 64-bit benchmarks at 14.4GB/sec read and 14GB/sec write (expected)
#TERACOPY PRO BENEFITS SOFTWARE#
Locally from a RAMDISK to RAMDISK and get 2.1GB/sec.ĭrives with a software stripe RAID via Disk Management and dynamic disks and Locally from a second 960 PRO windows software RAID setup in DIMM.2_1 and DIMM.2_2 That raid has 10GB/sec read speed and 10GB/sec write speed (expected) I get:Ĩ.01 64-bit benchmarks at 11.4GB/sec read and 10GB/sec write (expected) Via Disk Management and dynamic disks and run the benchmarks. (2x) 980 Pro drives (using slots M.2_1 & M.2_2) with a software stripe RAID Of 4.2GB/sec of simultaneous throughput). Locally, simultaneously on both of the 980 PRO drives and get 2.1GB/sec each (total Locally from a RAMDISK and get 2.1GB/sec. Locally from a second 980 PRO setup in M.2_2 and get 2.1GB/sec Locally from the same disk and get 2.1GB/sec. That raid has 7GB/sec read speed and 5GB/sec write speed (expected) I then benchmarkĨ.01 64-bit benchmarks at 7GB/sec read and 5GB/sec write (expected)
VENGEANCE PRO RGB 128GB (8 x 16GB) DDR4 3200 Non-Raid NVMEĭrivers for 960 PRO (none available for the 980 Pro)Īdditional Anti-virus, only Windows Defenderįirst 980 Pro NVME in first slot M.2_1 as recommended by asus.
#TERACOPY PRO BENEFITS DRIVER#
Some microsoft NVME driver limits I should be aware of ?
Limit related to AMD implementations running windows ? Limit in Windows Pro or the file copy software ? If I use standard windows copy or use TeraCopy I still get this hard speed limit on file copy at 2.1GB/sec (that's GigaBytes).
#TERACOPY PRO BENEFITS WINDOWS 10#
Is about potential file copy speed limits in windows 10 Pro.Īsk the question first in an effort to save some reading time for all:
0 kommentar(er)
